Hmmm. Even without
reading this book, I loved it. I saw it as a proof in my bookstore and grabbed
it, flicked through a few really fantastic passages, and then took it home. As
I read more and more, it lost a little of its appeal. All the little quirks
that I started off enjoying began to annoy me, a tiny bit. It still held my
interest. I still think it is a clever, mostly well-written and certainly
unique book, but Where Things Come
Back did lose me, just a little.
I thought this book
was a case of the secondary, peripheral characters being the more interesting.
I couldn’t warm to any of the main narrators. In fact, I think this is my main
problem with the book. I didn’t really like anyone. And I don’t think it’s a
reflection of their actual personalities, but the way they are written about –
with a certain cynical, cold-hearted view. This book has warmth but it isn’t
found in the characters, and that prevents me from caring. What I did enjoy was
the way Whaley built up some characters, like Lucas and John Barling, so we
formed an idea of them. And then he dropped a subtle bombshell which revealed
all their hidden parts and motivations. The best example was when Cullen talks
to John on the swing. Love moments like these.
I think the writing
did show signs of this being a debut novel. It is very Dawson’s Creek. Full of emotion but in that cynical, referential
way, that can be hip but is really, I feel, sometimes just disguised
indulgence. It makes me smile the way people are always referred to by their
full name. At the start I didn’t mind Cullen referring to himself in the third
person but it does wear a little thin.
As for Cullen and
his main crew – well they are so unobtrusively hip that it’s all pretty
harmless. I can understand why some will love his cynical self. I felt all a
bit blasé about it all. And I’m still not sure if the ending is real or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment